Introduction
In multi-step grant application processes like those of the EIC Accelerator, the involvement of different evaluators at each stage presents a unique challenge. This system can lead to inconsistencies in evaluations, affecting the outcome for applicants. Understanding the implications of this structure is crucial for startups and SMEs navigating the grant application landscape.
The Multi-Step Evaluation Process and Its Challenges
- Varied Perspectives: Different evaluators bring their own perspectives, expertise, and biases to each stage. This diversity, while valuable for comprehensive assessment, can lead to differing opinions on the same application.
- Inconsistency in Feedback and Scoring: As applications progress through various stages, they may receive conflicting feedback or varying scores, creating confusion for applicants and making it difficult to address evaluators’ concerns effectively.
- Strategic Difficulty for Applicants: Applicants may find it challenging to develop a consistent strategy when facing different sets of evaluators. What appeals to one group may not necessarily resonate with another, complicating the preparation of pitch decks, interviews, and responses.
- Uncertainty in Outcome: The involvement of different evaluators at each stage introduces an element of unpredictability, making it difficult for applicants to gauge their application’s progress and potential success.
Navigating the Challenge of Diverse Evaluators
- Comprehensive Preparation: Prepare a well-rounded application that addresses all aspects of the project – innovation, market potential, team capability, and feasibility. This holistic approach can appeal to a broad range of evaluators.
- Adaptable Communication Strategies: Develop flexible communication strategies for different stages. Tailor your pitch and responses to suit the focus of each evaluation round, whether it’s technical details, business potential, or implementation strategies.
- Seeking Feedback and Learning: After each stage, seek feedback, regardless of the outcome. Use this feedback to understand different evaluators’ perspectives and refine your application for future stages or other grant opportunities.
- Engaging Professional Assistance: Consider consulting with professionals who have experience with multi-stage grant processes. They can provide insights on effectively navigating the changes in evaluator panels.
- Maintaining Consistency in Core Message: While adapting to different stages, maintain a consistent core message about your project’s value proposition. This consistency helps in building a strong, coherent narrative throughout the application process.
Conclusion
The involvement of different evaluators in each stage of grant applications, such as the EIC Accelerator, introduces a significant challenge in achieving a consistent outcome. By preparing comprehensively, adapting communication strategies, actively seeking feedback, and maintaining a consistent core message, applicants can better navigate this complexity and enhance their chances of success.
About
The articles found on Rasph.com reflect the opinions of Rasph or its respective authors and in no way reflect opinions held by the European Commission (EC) or the European Innovation Council (EIC). The provided information aims to share perspectives that are valuable and can potentially inform applicants regarding grant funding schemes such as the EIC Accelerator, EIC Pathfinder, EIC Transition or related programs such as Innovate UK in the United Kingdom or the Small Business Innovation and Research grant (SBIR) in the United States.
The articles can also be a useful resource for other consultancies in the grant space as well as professional grant writers who are hired as freelancers or are part of a Small and Medium-sized Enterprise (SME). The EIC Accelerator is part of Horizon Europe (2021-2027) which has recently replaced the previous framework program Horizon 2020.
This article was written by ChatEIC. ChatEIC is an EIC Accelerator assistant that can advise on the writing of proposals, discuss current trends and create insightful articles on a variety of topics. The articles written by ChatEIC can contain inaccurate or outdated information.
- Contact Us -
EIC Accelerator Articles
All Eligible EIC Accelerator Countries (including the United Kingdom, Switzerland and Ukraine)
Explaining the Resubmission Process for the EIC Accelerator
A Short but Comprehensive Explanation of the EIC Accelerator
The EIC’s One-Stop Shop Funding Framework (Pathfinder, Transition, Accelerator)
Deciding Between EIC Pathfinder, Transition and Accelerator
A Winning Candidate for the EIC Accelerator
The Challenge with EIC Accelerator Open Calls: MedTech Innovations Dominate
Go Fund Yourself: Are EIC Accelerator Equity Investments Necessary? (Presenting Grant+)
Digging Deep: The New DeepTech Focus of the EIC Accelerator and its Funding Bottlenecks
Zombie Innovation: EIC Accelerator Funding for the Living Dead
Smack My Pitch Up: Changing The Evaluation Focus Of The EIC Accelerator
How Deep Is Your Tech? The European Innovation Council Impact Report (EIC Accelerator)
Analyzing A Leaked EIC Accelerator Interview List (Success Rates, Industries, Direct Submissions)
Steering the EIC Accelerator: Lessons Learned from the Pilot Program
Who Should Not Apply To The EIC Accelerator And Why
The Risk of Presenting all Risks in the High-Risk EIC Accelerator Program
How to Prepare an EIC Accelerator Resubmission
How to Prepare a Good EIC Accelerator Application: General Project Advice
How to Craft an EIC Accelerator Rebuttal: Explaining Grant Proposal Resubmissions
